Technology: Emerson and Nye Essay

Can you perchance conceive of life in today’s society without engineering? Most would state that life would be so hard to populate in without holding the technological aid to fulfill them. Ever since the human race came into being. we have strived to contrive tools that can be used in our day-to-day life in order to soothe and alleviate us. Even the smallest things require some kind of engineering. For illustration in order to speak to person outside your immediate locality you use a phone. It’s come to the point that people depend on it. The sarcasm is adult male believes that since they built engineering they automatically have control over it. However. our dependence on engineering is so overpowering that we lose our control over it. Ralph Waldo Emerson clearly states this in his verse form “Ode. inscribed to W. H. Channing. David E. Nye’s essay. on the other manus. presents the history of the promotion of engineering that humans face. To be specific. Nye uses instances that involve Japan’s civilization and traditions. Marx’s point of position of engineering. the Victorians quandary with engineering. and many other illustrations to convey his complicated sentiment of technological determinism.

Although both historiographers present changing ideas about this thought of technological determinism. I personally agree with Emerson on that worlds are non capable of commanding their ain inventions at this point in today’s universe. When analysing Emerson’s verse form. one can detect how he uses many metaphors to convey his sentiment. For case. he uses the “chattel” and “thing” as a metaphor of engineering and this is dry because both engineering and the movable are normally thought of as ownerships. Hence. it is controlled and owned. But. he goes on to state “Things are in the saddle and sit mankind” and this is dry because the initial principle. that adult male has the control. is altered. What he fundamentally tries to provinces is that our society is lead to believe that the adult male is in the saddle. However it is the “thing” that rides adult male. This implies that adult male about subjects himself to engineering. Emerson so goes on to speak about the two Torahs present in society. He emphasizes the separate Torahs applicable to adult male and thing. This shows how they are two separate entities that do non work in partnership.

Historically adult male. by nature. physiques and creates his ain towns and fleets. nevertheless through the technological progresss adult male has been replaced and it is now engineering that “builds town and fleet…” However. as suggested by Emerson. this technologically built towns and fleets “runs wild. ” proposing that engineering is an entity that adult male has no control over. Though this society is built by engineering and makes lives much easier. world has lost control over it. Hence. Emerson states that people looses their control over engineering. or becomes “unking” to something that they have built. In comparing to David E. Nye’s essay “Does Technology Control Us? ” it is noticeable that Nye suggests a assortment of positions sing how people saw the power of engineering in relation to the human society.

For case. one of the first examples Nye nowadayss is the rejection of the gun by the Japanese. In this illustration. Nye conveys how the state of Japan was able to reject such a powerful and advanced signifier of arms in order to continue the Samurai civilization of utilizing ancient traditional arms including blades. This clearly suggests that a human society is capable of finding whether or non to accept a new signifier of engineering. even if the benefits seem to outweigh the disadvantages of the invention. However. subsequently throughout Nye’s essay. one can detect that he besides states illustrations in which engineering does look to hold a dominant function in society. For illustration. Nye tells his readers that some Victorians were afraid of losing control or “political agencies. ” To be specific. this refers to the quickly turning usage and sum of machinery. This is because Nye implies that the machinery takes over the undertakings that the people are assigned as their occupations.

Nye creates a follow up to this illustration by adverting how Marx “argued that industrialization’s immediate consequences were mostly negative for the on the job category. ” This is entirely due to the fact that skilled workers lost their occupations and as the freshly made mills did all the work they were required to make. And because of this. some believe that “industrialization broke the bonds of communities and widened the spreads between societal categories. ” Overall. Nye does non straight present his sentiment of whether or non engineering controls worlds or frailty versa. Alternatively. he mentions the statements that other historiographers of engineering believe. which does non confirm or rebut. but complicates what Emerson has stated in his verse form. After analysing both Emerson’s and Nye’s statements. I personally believe that worlds have limited control over their technological creative activities merely to a certain extent. When I say “limited. ” I mean that when the technological creative activity is monolithic and is go oning to turn quickly globally worlds can lose control over it and be dominated by it. For case. worlds can hold control over the machinery they use when working.

However. similar to Marx’s statement within Nye’s essay. when these machines are advanced to make the same type of work more expeditiously. there is a lessening in demand for factory workers. At this point. it is apparent that there is a power displacement from human to engineering. Another illustration that is a spot modern would be the promotion of arms. Yes. in Nye’s essay. the Japanese were able to reject the guns and the benefits it came with. But today’s. guns have been adopted all over the universe. and engineering has improved the power of arms so much that they are really deadly and destructive if used. When the guns were foremost invented. worlds had the power to command its amendss.

At this point. it was used for one intent: to hit at individual marks at a clip. Now. nevertheless. we have new arms such as machine guns. missiles. atomic arms. and now even biological arms. This conveys the loss of human control over the technological arms as the power of these arms is non governable when released. The harm that will ensue in is inevitable and engineering. even as of today. is still go oning the promotion of arms. To reason. the thought Emerson tries to show in his verse form is more realistic at this point in today’s universe.

Technology has grown so quickly and massively that no state or group of people tends to reject it. Technology has grown so quickly and massively that no state or group of people tends to reject it. It is so advanced and utile that people rely on it in their day-to-day lives. doing their lives simpler. Nye conveys his sentiment by saying assorted instances throughout history of when societies both adapted engineering and refused to accept it. doing his determinism complicated. On the other manus. Emerson’s extract is more accurate by analyzing the plant of the modern universe. which leaves me no other option but to hold with Emerson.

Plants Cited
Emerson. Ralph W. Early Poems of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Boston: Thomas Y. Crowell & A ; Company. 1899. Nye. David E. Technology Matters: Questions to Populate With. London: The MIT P. 2007.