Learning Styles Essay

Having studied a little figure of larning manners I will measure my ain personal acquisition manner and how I can utilize this through the following three old ages of my life at Bucks New University. I will look at the most popular theories in usage today and their value in today’s universe. The theory of single acquisition manners began in the 1970’s and developed exhaustively in the 1980’s going more and more popular in recent old ages. The usage of MRI scan information was added to already developing theories to understand how the encephalon processed information.

( Revell. P. May 05 ) A larning reappraisal carried out in 2004 by the ‘Learning and Skills Research Centre’ revealed that there are 71 established larning manner theories. a figure of these are really similar in manner. I am traveling to concentrate on 3 widely used theories methods. David Kolb’s larning manner theoretical account. Honey & A ; Mumford’s Learning Style Questionnaire and Fleming’s VARK. ( Image ) This diagram shows the ‘cycle of learning’ created by Kolb. David Kolb. began developing his Learning Style theoretical account in 1971. he so published his learning manner theoretical account in 1984.

The theoretical account is made of 4 acquisition manners ; experience. contemplation. reflecting and be aftering. In his rhythm of larning Kolb describes that we will see something. reflect on what happened. believe how we can alter or what we can utilize once more and so move upon this and make it once more altering any errors we made first clip unit of ammunition. hence reiterating the rhythm. For illustration when larning to sit a motorcycle you may fall off due to hitting a tree ( the experience. ) expression at what why we hit the tree. non looking up?

( reflect. ) think about how we can alter why we fell off. look frontward as we are siting ( program ) and so eventually seek once more to sit looking frontward. This rhythm may reiterate itself many times before we get right what we was seeking to larn. Honey & A ; Mumford’s questionnaire ( IMAGE ) In 1992 Peter Honey and Alan Mumford created a questionnaire for scholars to place their acquisition manner. The questionnaire originally consisted of 80 inquiries but this has been shortened and made available with merely 40 question’s. Honey and Mumford’s theoretical account is based to a great extent on the Kolb theoretical account but focuses in on the mediate phases of the rhythm.

They agree with Kolb that all phases are important to larning. they suggest that some people tend to be happier with one phase of the rhythm over others. ( Cameron. S 1995 ) Honey and Mumford determined four acquisition manners that people may prefer to utilize than seeking to utilize the whole rhythm of Kolb’s theoretical account. The four phases are. militants. reflectors. theoreticians and pragmatists. Militants are really unfastened minded. will seek new things without much idea. are really sociable and likely prefer group work. However they are likely to acquire world-weary really rapidly and happen it difficult to sit still for long periods of clip.

Militants will most probably be the contrivers within the selling industry as they have tonss of experiences and bask get the better ofing obstructions. they will most probably be watched closely by the director due to their inclinations to leap in. act and believe afterwards. Reflectors are much more inactive and will believe in much more depth before making any decision’s. they will be given to take more of a back place function and observe others. A brooding member of staff would do be good in a director function because they think with their caputs. non their bosom and would hence do determinations that are more enlightening.

Theorists enjoy nearing jobs logically and holding information to endorse up theories. Theorists are really good at analyzing informations and researching in deepness. They can fight to work with militants as they act first so think whereas theoreticians will believe ( a batch ) before moving. Theorist would be best at making marketing research and analyzing the information as this something they excel at. Pragmatists like the freedom of making something new. they don’t like being restricted to put thoughts. They enjoy job resolution and are really practical but they do acquire bored really rapidly.

Pragmatists would be antic in a originative environment and hence perfect for making advertizements utilizing their enterprise. Ian flemings VARK VARK stands for Visual. Aural. Read/write and Kinaesthetic. Fleming developed his theory based on old VAK manners but added the read/write in 1987. ‘From what I read and observed. it seemed obvious that some pupils had a distinguishable penchant for the written word whilst others preferred symbolic information’ ( Fleming. N. 2006 ) Fleming’s questionnaire has 16 inquiry. so that people take it more earnestly and make non acquire bored while make fulling out the questionnaire.

Ocular scholars prefer to look at images and the usage of coloring material. When doing notes a ocular scholar will utilize images. symbols and high spot key words with coloring material. When be aftering a piece of work ocular scholars may utilize temper boards and head maps for them to acquire inspiration from before organizing into words. Audio scholars prefer to listen to talks or holding things explained to them. they enjoy group treatments and are really good at depicting ocular things in great item. Audio scholars can profit from reading aloud their notes while entering themselves.

When be aftering for a piece of work an audio scholar may happen it better to talk through their thoughts with a friend. Read/write scholars much prefer to compose down notes and take information from text books. when interrupting down statistical information they will depict any tendencies alternatively of pulling them. Read/write scholars will stand out at essay authorship and when be aftering a piece of work they will compose lists and notes. Kinesthetic scholars prefer to merely seek new things and touch things to assist them larn. Field trips for the ideal for kinesthetic scholars as they can take in all the information around them. without acquiring bored.

When finishing a piece of work they will merely utilize test and mistake until they get it right. Without admiting your ain manner you may promote your squad to concentrate on issues from a certain position and lose the chances that result from different attacks. A squad has a corporate acquisition manner all of its ain. ( Haygroup ) My acquisition manner After finishing the 1982 version of the Honey and Mumford questionnaire I scored: Militant 6 Reflector16 Theorist15 Pragmatist 8 From these consequences I now understand that I prefer to step back and observe others. I require more clip and information to do determinations.

From old experience I would state that I wholly agree with this for illustration when doing a determination about any expensive purchase I will ever look at information about and research the best monetary values before doing a determination. So I do on a regular basis utilize the reflector and theoretician manners. From finishing the 13 inquiry VARK questionnaire I have scored: Visual1 Audio0 Read/write4 Kinaesthetic 7 From these consequences I can see that I am kinesthetic scholar. this contradicts my findings from the Honey and Mumford questionnaire where I found id instead observe and take in information.

Where as from this VARK questionnaire I have found that Idaho instead use test and mistake and larn utilizing custodies on methods. This contradictions surprise me as the manners are so different but I do understand that this is true to me. I do prefer to larn on my ain and take in a batch of information before making an essay but when it comes to larn how to utilize something new I prefer to merely keep it and seek it out. Decision From my research I have found that many of the acquisition manners are really similar but are constructed in their ain manner and helps the scholar to set up their manner in its single manner.

Kolb’s larning theory would non be able to be broken up into subdivisions but the Honey and Mumford theory is based on Kolb’s so I can be compared to the VARK theory I have besides looked at. I do believe I can partner off these up every bit follows because they have really similar inclinations. Active and Visual scholars like images to excite them. Reflectors and Audio would prefer to look back at a talk and re-do their notes to accommodate them. Theorists and Read/Write scholars prefer looking at information in texts. Pragmatists and kinesthetic scholars are both originative and acquire world-weary rapidly.

From what I have learnt signifier this essay and have found out about how I learn will assist me analyze through the following three old ages without me fighting or acquiring bored. Learning manner is the manner human existences take in new and/or hard information. how they process. shop and recover it. ( Prashnig. Bacillus: Debating Learning Styles ) Having studied a little figure of larning manners I will measure my ain personal acquisition manner and how I can utilize this through the following three old ages of my life at Bucks New University. I will look at the most popular theories in usage today and their value in today’s universe.

The theory of single acquisition manners began in the 1970’s and developed exhaustively in the 1980’s going more and more popular in recent old ages. The usage of MRI scan information was added to already developing theories to understand how the encephalon processed information. ( Revell. P. May 05 ) A larning reappraisal carried out in 2004 by the ‘Learning and Skills Research Centre’ revealed that there are 71 established larning manner theories. a figure of these are really similar in manner. I am traveling to concentrate on 3 widely used theories methods. David Kolb’s larning manner theoretical account. Honey & A ; Mumford’s Learning Style Questionnaire and Fleming’s VARK.

( Image ) This diagram shows the ‘cycle of learning’ created by Kolb. David Kolb. began developing his Learning Style theoretical account in 1971. he so published his learning manner theoretical account in 1984. The theoretical account is made of 4 acquisition manners ; experience. contemplation. reflecting and be aftering. In his rhythm of larning Kolb describes that we will see something. reflect on what happened. believe how we can alter or what we can utilize once more and so move upon this and make it once more altering any errors we made first clip unit of ammunition. hence reiterating the rhythm.

For illustration when larning to sit a motorcycle you may fall off due to hitting a tree ( the experience. ) expression at what why we hit the tree. non looking up? ( reflect. ) think about how we can alter why we fell off. look frontward as we are siting ( program ) and so eventually seek once more to sit looking frontward. This rhythm may reiterate itself many times before we get right what we was seeking to larn. Honey & A ; Mumford’s questionnaire ( IMAGE ) In 1992 Peter Honey and Alan Mumford created a questionnaire for scholars to place their acquisition manner.

The questionnaire originally consisted of 80 inquiries but this has been shortened and made available with merely 40 question’s. Honey and Mumford’s theoretical account is based to a great extent on the Kolb theoretical account but focuses in on the mediate phases of the rhythm. They agree with Kolb that all phases are important to larning. they suggest that some people tend to be happier with one phase of the rhythm over others. ( Cameron. S 1995 ) Honey and Mumford determined four acquisition manners that people may prefer to utilize than seeking to utilize the whole rhythm of Kolb’s theoretical account.

The four phases are. militants. reflectors. theoreticians and pragmatists. Militants are really unfastened minded. will seek new things without much idea. are really sociable and likely prefer group work. However they are likely to acquire world-weary really rapidly and happen it difficult to sit still for long periods of clip. Militants will most probably be the contrivers within the selling industry as they have tonss of experiences and bask get the better ofing obstructions. they will most probably be watched closely by the director due to their inclinations to leap in. act and believe afterwards.

Reflectors are much more inactive and will believe in much more depth before making any decision’s. they will be given to take more of a back place function and observe others. A brooding member of staff would do be good in a director function because they think with their caputs. non their bosom and would hence do determinations that are more enlightening. Theorists enjoy nearing jobs logically and holding information to endorse up theories. Theorists are really good at analyzing informations and researching in deepness.

They can fight to work with militants as they act first so think whereas theoreticians will believe ( a batch ) before moving. Theorist would be best at making marketing research and analyzing the information as this something they excel at. Pragmatists like the freedom of making something new. they don’t like being restricted to put thoughts. They enjoy job resolution and are really practical but they do acquire bored really rapidly. Pragmatists would be antic in a originative environment and hence perfect for making advertizements utilizing their enterprise.

Ian flemings VARK VARK stands for Visual. Aural. Read/write and Kinaesthetic. Fleming developed his theory based on old VAK manners but added the read/write in 1987. ‘From what I read and observed. it seemed obvious that some pupils had a distinguishable penchant for the written word whilst others preferred symbolic information’ ( Fleming. N. 2006 ) Fleming’s questionnaire has 16 inquiry. so that people take it more earnestly and make non acquire bored while make fulling out the questionnaire. Ocular scholars prefer to look at images and the usage of coloring material.

When doing notes a ocular scholar will utilize images. symbols and high spot key words with coloring material. When be aftering a piece of work ocular scholars may utilize temper boards and head maps for them to acquire inspiration from before organizing into words. Audio scholars prefer to listen to talks or holding things explained to them. they enjoy group treatments and are really good at depicting ocular things in great item. Audio scholars can profit from reading aloud their notes while entering themselves. When be aftering for a piece of work an audio scholar may happen it better to talk through their thoughts with a friend.

Read/write scholars much prefer to compose down notes and take information from text books. when interrupting down statistical information they will depict any tendencies alternatively of pulling them. Read/write scholars will stand out at essay authorship and when be aftering a piece of work they will compose lists and notes. Kinesthetic scholars prefer to merely seek new things and touch things to assist them larn. Field trips for the ideal for kinesthetic scholars as they can take in all the information around them. without acquiring bored. When finishing a piece of work they will merely utilize test and mistake until they get it right.

Without admiting your ain manner you may promote your squad to concentrate on issues from a certain position and lose the chances that result from different attacks. A squad has a corporate acquisition manner all of its ain. ( Haygroup ) My acquisition manner After finishing the 1982 version of the Honey and Mumford questionnaire I scored: Militant 6 Reflector16 Theorist15 Pragmatist 8 From these consequences I now understand that I prefer to step back and observe others. I require more clip and information to do determinations.

From old experience I would state that I wholly agree with this for illustration when doing a determination about any expensive purchase I will ever look at information about and research the best monetary values before doing a determination. So I do on a regular basis utilize the reflector and theoretician manners. From finishing the 13 inquiry VARK questionnaire I have scored: Visual1 Audio0 Read/write4 Kinaesthetic 7 From these consequences I can see that I am kinesthetic scholar. this contradicts my findings from the Honey and Mumford questionnaire where I found id instead observe and take in information.

Where as from this VARK questionnaire I have found that Idaho instead use test and mistake and larn utilizing custodies on methods. This contradictions surprise me as the manners are so different but I do understand that this is true to me. I do prefer to larn on my ain and take in a batch of information before making an essay but when it comes to larn how to utilize something new I prefer to merely keep it and seek it out. Decision From my research I have found that many of the acquisition manners are really similar but are constructed in their ain manner and helps the scholar to set up their manner in its single manner.

Kolb’s larning theory would non be able to be broken up into subdivisions but the Honey and Mumford theory is based on Kolb’s so I can be compared to the VARK theory I have besides looked at. I do believe I can partner off these up every bit follows because they have really similar inclinations. Active and Visual scholars like images to excite them. Reflectors and Audio would prefer to look back at a talk and re-do their notes to accommodate them. Theorists and Read/Write scholars prefer looking at information in texts. Pragmatists and kinesthetic scholars are both originative and acquire world-weary rapidly.

From what I have learnt signifier this essay and have found out about how I learn will assist me analyze through the following three old ages without me fighting or acquiring bored. Reference List 1 ) Cameron. S. ( 2005 ) The concern pupils enchiridion. March 2005. Essex. Pearson educated limited 2 ) Prashnig. B. ( n. vitamin D ) Debating Learning Styles hypertext transfer protocol: //www. creativelearningcentre. com/downloads/Debating % 20LS. pdf 3 ) Revell. P. ( May 2005 ) Each to their ain: The Guardian hypertext transfer protocol: //www. defender. co. uk/education/2005/may/31/schools. uk3 4 ) Fleming. N. . and Baume. D.

( 2006 ) Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree! . Educational Developments. SEDA Ltd. Issue 7. 4. Nov. 2006. p4-7. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. vark-learn. com/documents/Educational % 20 Developments. pdf 5 ) Haygroup hypertext transfer protocol: //www. haygroup. com/tl/Downloads/Why_People_Learn. pdf 6 ) Chapman. A ( 2005 ) Kolb larning manners hypertext transfer protocols: //www. businessballs. com/kolblearningstyles. htm 7 ) Kolbs larning rhythm diagram hypertext transfer protocol: //www. ldu. Leedss. Ac. uk/ldu/sddu_multimedia/kolb/static_version. php 8 ) hypertext transfer protocol: //www. vark-learn. com/english/page. asp? p=hel [ sheets